Canadian Airgun Forum

The #1 Community for Airguns in Canada!
It is currently Wed Apr 17, 2024 10:17 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


The Canadian Airgun Forums are a place for people to discuss and learn about airguns and the airgunning sport in Canada. There are lots of discussions about airguns, airgun accessories, reviews, modification and repair information, airgun events, field target and free classifieds!

 

You need to register before you can post: click the register link to proceed. Before you register, please read the forum rules. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own pictures, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free! To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.







Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 10:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:00 pm
Posts: 629
....I see on the News that ownership of restricted weapons has increased over 10% in the last year....Now, would this mean over 10% new owners, or have sales just increased 10% to already current owners?......Seems the anti-gun advocates are a tad 'concerned' ..... I wonder how many are 500+ fps airpistols?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 11:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 2:30 am
Posts: 390
Location: South Calgary
Interesting ... as a restricted gun owner and a participant in IPSC shooting here in Alberta, I've noticed quite a few new shooters to the sport so I would lean toward new owners vs current owners.
Absolutely no facts to support that, just my observation.

_________________
SR1911 .45ACP
Smith & Wesson M&P 9mm
Savage Mk II BTVS / Nikon 3-9x40 BDC150
Canuck 12 Ga O/U
Webley Alecto .22
Webley Tempest .22
Crosman 2240 .22
Crosman 1322 .22
Beretta PX4 .177
Member of NFA, CSSA & IPSC


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 12:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:35 pm
Posts: 11351
Location: P.G. B.C.
Same here - handgun owners at our range by far and far outnumber the rifle or shotgun shooters.

_________________
Best Wishes
Daryl


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 1:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 5:15 am
Posts: 4137
Location: Edmonton
Definitely, the stat as expressed mean 10% more restricted gun owners since the last tally. And I would say 0% to the number of restricted air pistol owners included in that number. Very simply stated, firearms sales, and handgun sales in particular, are booming throughout North America. And if you don't know why, let me introduce you to a concept called pop culture in its true sense... another time, perhaps.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 7:23 am
Posts: 4259
Location: Somewheres near the Atlantic
Mean restricted firearms, not weapons? you make it sound criminal.

Well in NS, 2 indoor ranges popped up in the last couple years and a new one in Halifax is being built. I think its easier to build a indoor range than a outdoor. Laws, and cost. Esp if you live in a huge city like Toronto, or Montreal.

One year our outdoor range was closed due to snow, so more members moved over to using the indoor range at our club and pistols. The more the better.

Talks about another club in NS making a indoor range.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 10:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:35 pm
Posts: 11351
Location: P.G. B.C.
Careful - indoor ranges are susceptibility to extreme regulations as to lead containment - blowers, etc.

Outdoor ranges (edge of city like here) including covers, roofs, are much easier and cheap in comparison.

Inside high population cities - outdoor ranges do not work for obvious reasons - bullet containment & space.

_________________
Best Wishes
Daryl


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 11:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 7:23 am
Posts: 4259
Location: Somewheres near the Atlantic
Daryl wrote:
Careful - indoor ranges are susceptibility to extreme regulations as to lead containment - blowers, etc.

Outdoor ranges (edge of city like here) including covers, roofs, are much easier and cheap in comparison.

Inside high population cities - outdoor ranges do not work for obvious reasons - bullet containment & space.


Yeah but allows you to put them in inner cities. Where outdoor, your regulated by templates, noise etc.

Our club just spent a lot of money on in floor heating, and new ventilation and blowers. It didn't bother me like some other indoor ranges.

Actually there is a indoor range in Dartmouth. Its actually in a residential area and in between 2 duplex houses. I shot there for many years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 8:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:00 pm
Posts: 629
My apologies for using the term weapon.....I always refrain from using "gun" or "weapon", using "firearm" instead.....Don't know what happened there, maybe it was in the media report that way (probably) ..... Anyone aware of any 'underground' or 'semi-underground' ranges?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 2:30 am
Posts: 390
Location: South Calgary
I think "underground" range is not a topic that would encourage much discussion. Canadian law dictates that a hand gun can only be discharged at a government approved range. On top of that, you must be a member of such a range before you can even buy that gun.
However, if I lived out in the boonies, (or knew someone that would allow me access), and their neighbours were far enough away, (could not hear the shot), then you could probably get away with it. Against the law, mind you! I would not shoot too fast and also have a rifle that sounded similar on the outside chance that someone heard me shooting and decided to investigate.
To me that would be a little too risky. I would not want to lose my guns and license, however the location would influence my decision on that.

_________________
SR1911 .45ACP
Smith & Wesson M&P 9mm
Savage Mk II BTVS / Nikon 3-9x40 BDC150
Canuck 12 Ga O/U
Webley Alecto .22
Webley Tempest .22
Crosman 2240 .22
Crosman 1322 .22
Beretta PX4 .177
Member of NFA, CSSA & IPSC


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2016 12:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:00 pm
Posts: 629
...Ahh,....I think you misunderstood .....I meant actually "underground".....I think having a range "beneath the earth" would be a less expensive and safer option than "above ground".....Where could a bullet fly off to if you were underground (or the basement of a large building,perhaps ?)....I have a .44 Colt that used to get a lot of use, but the range closed down....And now it's a bit far and the 'new' range is far more regimented with fewer options for pistol shooting .... I certainly wouldn't risk any alternatives though , for sure ...... That's funny, I never considered "underground" as meaning "underground", LOL ... (but I know what you mean, Stihltech )


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2016 1:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 2:30 am
Posts: 390
Location: South Calgary
The more I think of this, the more I laugh. I never even considered a range like you intended.
I guess that shows where my thinking is, (get your mind out of the gutter, you're blocking my view!)

_________________
SR1911 .45ACP
Smith & Wesson M&P 9mm
Savage Mk II BTVS / Nikon 3-9x40 BDC150
Canuck 12 Ga O/U
Webley Alecto .22
Webley Tempest .22
Crosman 2240 .22
Crosman 1322 .22
Beretta PX4 .177
Member of NFA, CSSA & IPSC


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2016 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2015 5:03 pm
Posts: 1228
Funny thing is, every time the government talks of banning this or that gun... people are rushing to buy one while they can.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2016 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 7:37 pm
Posts: 1099
Location: Montreal area
About an under ground range, the main thing would be sound level, even with ear protection, it would pouve to be a big concern. Unless using a supressor (illegal). It's a loose/loose situation. :cry:

_________________
4.5mm
To many and not enough.

6mm
Not enough and to many.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2016 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2015 5:03 pm
Posts: 1228
An underground range can't be any worse than any indoor range...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 7:23 am
Posts: 4259
Location: Somewheres near the Atlantic
I thought about burying 2 x 53' sea cans end to end and making a indoor range from them.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

phpBB SEO