Canadian Airgun Forum

The #1 Community for Airguns in Canada!
It is currently Fri May 03, 2024 11:10 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


The Canadian Airgun Forums are a place for people to discuss and learn about airguns and the airgunning sport in Canada. There are lots of discussions about airguns, airgun accessories, reviews, modification and repair information, airgun events, field target and free classifieds!

 

You need to register before you can post: click the register link to proceed. Before you register, please read the forum rules. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own pictures, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free! To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.







Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 4:57 pm
Posts: 1754
Location: mb
On another forum, I read a post that indicated that a SCUBA tank (88cf) had a captured energy
potential in excess of a quarter million ftlbs. :shock:

In an earlier thread, I had suggested that there may be a potential of 130 shots at ~485fps in a
modified 22XX Rifle. I still haven't ruled it out, but I'm beginning to believe the goal, may
be more lofty than I'd previously estimated.

For six carts I've recorded pellet velocities and converted it into ftlbs of energy. For every cart,
the gun has been tuned to a different velocity, ranging from a low of 435 to a high of XYZ(PM me).
It currently appears, that the greatest efficiency of conversion(expansion of gas to pellet momentum),
occurs at lower velocities, but I still haven't been able to measureably extract the amount of
energy required to shoot 130, 7.9gn pellets at ~485(roughly 540ftlbs).

My research certainly hasn't been exhaustive, and I've formed a few theories to explain my
current results, but it has suddenly hit me, that I really don't have a clue, as to the energy
potential of a CO2 cart. :oops:

Has anyone ever come across the figure as it relates to 12gm CO2 Cartridges? I understand
the answer has a significant temperature variable, let's assume 'room temperature'. Roughly, how
many ftlb of energy are contained/stored in 12gm of CO2?

_________________
Don't Be Sexist - Broads Hate That.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 8:35 am 
Offline
Supporting Members
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:54 pm
Posts: 6281
Location: Saint John NB
I like to shoot my gun :lol: To much thinking ruins that for me

_________________
Jonathan

Moderator


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 162
Location: Fort Erie, Ontario
Found this http://www.combro.co.uk/nigelh/diver/tank.html could possibly be converted to CO2 assuming your carty was gas only, no liquid,

Just a guess....

_________________
2X-Cr '44 Peacemaker' (.22 in need of repairs) (.177 near mint)
BAM-B4 .177
Cr 600
Cr 2240 (lightly modded)
Cr 2100 (in pieces)
Marksman 1792 (POS)
QB-78 .177 (495 FPS) W/ Leapers 3-9X40AO/MD
Gamo '68' .177
Hatsan Model 25 pistol, .177


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:20 am 
Offline
Supporting Member 2009
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:37 am
Posts: 3468
Location: Out There
I think you'd have to talk to a 12g cartridge manufacturer to find out if, in fact, there really is 12 grams of Co2 in a cartridge- and then find out the exact interior dimensions of the cartridge to figure anything out with any sort of accuracy.

Once you have this info, you can determine how much liquid vs. gas is in the cartridge, plug in the temperature and expansion rates and get the answer.

_________________
Please note: I do not conduct business through Private Messages (PM's) in online forums. Please do not send a 'PM" with a business-related question.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:06 pm
Posts: 31
Location: Finland
vAgRaNt wrote:
On another forum, I read a post that indicated that a SCUBA tank (88cf) had a captured energy
potential in excess of a quarter million ftlbs. :shock:

In an earlier thread, I had suggested that there may be a potential of 130 shots at ~485fps in a
modified 22XX Rifle. I still haven't ruled it out, but I'm beginning to believe the goal, may
be more lofty than I'd previously estimated.

For six carts I've recorded pellet velocities and converted it into ftlbs of energy. For every cart,
the gun has been tuned to a different velocity, ranging from a low of 435 to a high of XYZ(PM me).
It currently appears, that the greatest efficiency of conversion(expansion of gas to pellet momentum),
occurs at lower velocities, but I still haven't been able to measureably extract the amount of
energy required to shoot 130, 7.9gn pellets at ~485(roughly 540ftlbs).

My research certainly hasn't been exhaustive, and I've formed a few theories to explain my
current results, but it has suddenly hit me, that I really don't have a clue, as to the energy
potential of a CO2 cart. :oops:

Has anyone ever come across the figure as it relates to 12gm CO2 Cartridges? I understand
the answer has a significant temperature variable, let's assume 'room temperature'. Roughly, how
many ftlb of energy are contained/stored in 12gm of CO2?


You told to read about energy in the SCUBA tank. As far as I know it is simply PxV (bolume times pressure, use metric units), but I am not quite sure about it. Or let say, it depende how energy is released qnd what extend of the total energy can be converted to work in the barrel.

The case of CO2 is probably more complex bacause phase transition from liquid to gas phase.
I am not familiar with CO2 guns, so I'll ask. Is there a gas reservoire or is gas evaporated from the liquid during the shot.

-FinnishVisitor-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 12:26 pm
Posts: 294
Location: Vancouver in British Columbia
perhaps you will need to understand this

http://www.chem.arizona.edu/~salzmanr/4 ... vwork.html

You can also determine the work done (in ft.lbs) experimentally. how about this setup : make the 12gm Co2 expands along a constant temperature (i don't know how to do that) and the expansion will move a piston against a known friction force for some distance to be measured. Work=Force x Distance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:06 pm
Posts: 31
Location: Finland
That's correct. When gas is expanding it can do some work.
The amout of the work is not the same as energy stored in the gas whatsoever.
When gas expands it cools. This cooling is loss of energy too. But I don't really know if this energy can be used to drive your pellet?

Keeping CO2 cylinder in constant temp during the expansio is not easy. Just think about the liquid natural gas cylinder you use in your barbeque. When gas is used for prolonged period, cylinder cool and even frost can be found from the surface of the gas cylinder.

-FinnishVisitor-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: And the answer is.......
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 4:57 pm
Posts: 1754
Location: mb
notec wrote:
I dunno'.

twilight wrote:
Me either.

AirGunEric wrote:
You're screwed, it can't be done.

FinnishVisitor wrote:
I agree with Eric!

eragon wrote:
Perhaps, if you were smarter....

FinnishVisitor wrote:
Now I agree with 'eragon'

:P :lol: :P :lol: :P

I posed similar question over on the Green, where I know Steve in NC hangs out quite often. He was kind enough to share, that liquid CO2 has approximately 59FPE/gram of stored energy potential. This equates to somewhere around ~700FPE in a 12gm cart. I clearly understand that "12grams", is likely an averaged approximation, of the actual amount of CO2 in each cart, and additionally, much is lost to thermodynamics.

Thanks for the help guys; or at least being interested enough to weigh-in. :wink:

I'm not any closer to my goal, but at least I now know, that it's potentially theoretically possible.

_________________
Don't Be Sexist - Broads Hate That.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

phpBB SEO