Canadian Airgun Forum

Tks.

_________________
Best Wishes
Daryl

Obviously, your circumstances or similar, had nothing to do with the T.O. swat team's actions on the 3rd.

_________________
Best Wishes
Daryl

Today:

https://youtu.be/G28fCCGEFUU

https://www.simcoereformer.ca/news/loca ... ting-death

Note to a friend, a retired "member".
Something ever wrong here, *******. 1st of all, T.O. ERT making a hit 150KM's from Toronto?
Took their own ambulance with them from T.O. Didn't call the OPP until minutes or seconds before
their 'action'. The police waited for Roger to walk from his vehicle to the shop after he got home with
his wife from shopping. His wife was still unloading the vehicle when the police drove up, threw her to
the ground holding (SMG's?) on her while 3 others stormed the shop. The policeman shooting Roger never
entered the shop. The witness/customer? sitting a short distance from Roger made the appointment the
evening before, then disappeared. The police won't tell them who it was nor will the police give any of them
including their Lawyer, a copy of this so-called warrant. This really stinks. Sure looks like an execution to me.
Daryl

_________________
Best Wishes
Daryl

Were did you read this ...

_________________
VE7SHM//VE7ZJ

Moderator

The compilation is from his lawyer, family & friends video as well as friends interviewed at the scene "just after it happened" + CTV, CBC reports.

Did I read it was an execution, no - that is/was surmised by me, from the data that is known.

_________________
Best Wishes
Daryl

Thanks .

_________________
VE7SHM//VE7ZJ

Moderator

CBC Toronto from the 18th.

https://easybranches.com/amp/youtube/KlmDg01YZ4Y

Hmm, in this instance if he was able to grab a nearby firearm and shoot back.. would it have been a legal self defense move?? Maybe that's why they went in so hot knowing that if he knows that they know that he knows then he'll be blasting away and they didn't want to take the chance?

I wasn't there. I don't know any of the details other than what has been presented here. However, going into a situation with possible risk wouldn't you prepare for the possible senarios. Have non lethal responses? It is possible he was carrying a firearm on his person. Not enough details. A lot of speculation. Hope the full truth comes out but how likely is that?

_________________
I have some airguns.

\
Exactly. I am afraid it will come down to "whose truth".

_________________
Best Wishes
Daryl

sorry it is not possible he was carrying a firearm. I’ve known him since 1987 he was a professional and above board with dozens of police officers who were his customers and friends.

_________________
I machine, I build , I shoot
Sent via Flux Capacitor uF

And that is the impression I am getting. Above board and it all seems wrong. All of it.

_________________
I have some airguns.

The shooter not needing to make a statement and not being contacted for weeks. Laws appear to apply differently.

IMHO
Shooter should have been interviewed immediately - or at least the same day.
Reason for this: clarity of details and lack of time to "grow" a false story/plan amongst those present.

That this was not done, is in itself a travesty and shows complete lack of intent or desire for the actual truth to be known.

This "shooting" stinks to high heaven & shows a desire to bury the truth. I have been in contact with my 'retired cop' friends
and they feel exactly as I do.

We all feel this was an execution. That 1 policeman was the only one shooting, shows Roger likely did not have a firearm in his hands.
If one was present, which is entirely possible/probable, it was in a vice or on the bench in front of him. The mysterious stranger/
customer looks more and more like a plant. If I were a suspicious person, I would suspect that person had an illegal gun with him
and that perhaps Roger had it in his hands, looking at it for the first time. After all, Roger's meeting this person only happened seconds
or within 1 or 2 minutes of Roger and his wife getting home from shopping.
The sign on his door was in very poor taste. Yes, I know it was a joke, however, it will be used as a defense.
This stinks of an assassination and subsequent cover up by the investigation unit.

About the sign:
My bother had a sign in his shop when he was a licensed firearms manufacturer. It stated, with a picture of Yosemite Sam with a revolver in each hand:
"IF YOU ARE FOUND IN HERE TONIGHT, YOU WILL BE FOUND IN HERE TOMORROW"
The CFO of the Province back then, suggested he should take that sign down as it would/could be used against him in court as it showed intent.
The CFO at that time, had been my brother's firearms instructor in Depot Division. He was a nice guy - tough as nails in Regina, but that was training.

_________________
Best Wishes
Daryl