YepYep wrote:
Daryl wrote:
Some of the FX Impact Bull pups in videos have the bipod attachment on the tank, whether carbon fiber or steel.
There is something like an inch of threads, is there not? Even on my Dreamline and the Aselkon, the barrel band(s) connect
the barrel shroud to the tank.
I do understand your reluctance to do this, though and I see it as a money grab by FX for the 'needed' extension, which should have been included on the gun.
In retrospect, I feel the pic. rail provided, could/should have been extended full length of the tank.
Yes... The threads actually should be very strong~ The problem is on me~
[emoji38]
Maybe they call it their style?! And leave some market share for the aftermarket parts makers too? I bought the one from K&L in the States which costed me about 170 CAD with shipping, currency exchange... Not sure if still some tax to pay when I receive it...
I was looking at this at the begining as well, however, I noticed following:
1. the barrel is too short, make it looks not nice--afterall if I want spend that amount of $$ I want a beautiful rfile
2. Barrel too short x2 and x3, it makes it less power and less accurate in long range,
Impact M3 is rated as the most accurate long range air rifle in the world, you can shoot up to 200-250 yards with 1-2" group with JSB King Heavy or Slugs if you really know how to use this rifle--it is decent power even for small game hunting or even fox/raccoon at that range. Why should I yield that just for some compact.
3. There are well tuned used guns out there, much cheaper than new ones, you just need to wait for a good deal to get it!
Thus I got m3 sinper .25 with pellet and slug liners, used but decent in accuracy and at 50 yards it almost shot though a steel plate target in the range and make the strap broken so I have to walk out to find it!! (my .22 m16a 27 ft lb can only make a tiny dent on it)
That would be highly debatable even within the FX line.