The term "sling-shot hammer" was coined when my design for the SSG (stopping spring guide) was "borrowed" and turned into a commercial product (without my permission).... A simpler version uses a short, but stiffer spring to accomplish the same hammer energy, and has become known as the SSS (short, stiff spring).... The SSS requires more cocking force than a conventionally sprung hammer, because it has to get the hammer energy in a shorter distance, and the energy comes from average spring force times distance travelled while being propelled by the hammer.... By definition, an SSS has zero compression when the hammer is uncocked, to it must take more force to compress it when cocked.... It works almost as well as the SSG, but is harder to cock than a conventional (preloaded) hammer spring.... There are many variations of the SSG, here is the original one....
The SSG is preloaded when against the stop on the guide.... Therefore, for the same average force and hammer travel distance, it can require less force to cock it.... the best of both worlds.... A properly designed SSG will use a longer, weaker spring, preloaded against the stop on the guide, a relative long cocking distance, and the hammer will be in free flight for a short distance before hitting the valve stem.... When the hammer rebounds (thrown back by the closing valve), it meets a stationary spring that is already preloaded, and hence more difficult to recompress than an SSS.... The SSS can work OK, at the disadvantage of being harder to cock.... The SSG, when properly built, can eliminate hammer bounce (and the associated wasted air), and actually be easier to cock as well....
Bob